Shared Sharing Practice

Using formative assessment to prepare for National Qualifications in mathematics

Focus and context

Assessment FOR Learning

  • Our pupils and staff are given timely feedback about the quality of their work and how to make it better.

Curricular area(s): mathematics, upper secondary.

Curriculum for Excellence themes

Successful learners are able to:

  • use literacy, communication and numeracy skills
  • use technology for learning
  • learn independently and as part of a group.

Confident individuals are able to:

  • relate to others and manage themselves
  • be self-aware.

Effective contributors are able to:

  • work in partnership and in teams
  • apply critical thinking in new contexts
  • solve problems.

Project summary

The Highland Council covers a large area of Scotland and practitioners have worked for some years with researchers and consultants to embed formative assessment into everyday practice. From this work, it became clear that peer and self-assessment were central to developing the underlying principles of participation, engagement, dialogue and thinking. In 2007 the local authority offered secondary schools an opportunity to work collaboratively on the use of peer and self-assessment in preparing for national qualifications.  

This mathematics project involved seven secondary schools, with ASG members agreeing that peer and self-assessment would involve appropriate feedback and looking forward, and that 'opportunities to rectify difficulties must be provided, in order for pupils to benefit fully from the process of peer and self-assessment'. Each school developed an enquiry specific to its own needs and interests, and all projects involved senior classes or S3 credit classes. 

As the enquiry progressed, teachers’ initial concerns, for example about possible lack of student involvement, and indiscipline, changed to reflective analysis of the value of teachers’ surrendering some power to encourage increased engagement and motivation. Dialogue between students and with staff was improved. Sometimes the increased time spent in dialogue led to better quality feedback; at other times, no additional time was required. Much depended on the topic being studied. This led the group to consider how peer and self-assessment could be embedded in all mathematics topics appropriately. 

In summing up, this group recommended that peer and self-assessment should be developed from S1 to S6, and that one way to support this would be to make it a compulsory agenda item at all departmental meetings.

 

Case study extract

Dornoch Academy, in the evaluation of its project reported,

'In all, the exercise proved to be very beneficial to pupils and comments on questionnaires bear this out. It is also worth noting that on average students performed almost one full band better on their final prelim, which, although not constituting hard research evidence, nonetheless indicates some positive impact of peer and self-assessment on academic attainment.' 

The whole group noted that various strategies for dialogue helped pupils to become better learners.

'In seeking pupils to take greater responsibility for their own learning, teachers realised the importance of teaching various strategies for dialogue. For pupils, learning to become a teacher, it seems, is just as important as the learning itself. Pupils had to learn how to question themselves and each other as well as how to comment critically on each other's work. This was not something they found easy to do - particularly less able pupils - and where consequently the role of the teacher assumed even greater significance.

This group believes strongly in the value of peer and self-assessment in raising attainment and achievement.'

 

Points to consider

  1. It is evident that peer and self-assessment can be used effectively in the upper stages to help students take more responsibility for their own learning. This project linked formative assessment to personal learning planning. To what extent could you use the interface between assessment for and as learning to help students, particularly those preparing for National Qualifications, to take more responsibility for their own learning?
  2. Culloden Academy reported success with the use of highlighters (as ‘traffic lighting’) particularly for students who were not expected to attain particularly good exam results. Why do you think this attention to formative assessment strategies could particularly benefit such students?
  3. AifL has been well received, particularly in primary and lower secondary. How does this study affect your views on or experience of helping senior students to do well in National Qualifications? To what extent can the approaches advocated by the AifL programme improve learning when used consistently from early years to S6?

Contact details

If you would like further information on this case study, please contact the local authority assessment co-ordinator. You can find contact details for each authority area on our local authority co-ordinators' contacts page.

Related links

Glossary

Explore an A-Z list of terminology used throughout this website, with definitions and explanations of the AifL strategies and techniques.

Curriculum for Excellence

Find out more about the capacities of Curriculum for Excellence.